A small step for the women skillers, a big step for ethical retreat.

English | Chinese Original

English translation of the Chinese original. This version is generated for international readers and may be refined over time.

Date: 2026-04-09

I saw someone put Zhang Snow Peak.

That's too fucking stupid.

Zhang Xue Feng is a real teacher who has his own profession, his own perspective and a framework for his life.

He's working on it. How much do you mean you distill him into a skill and put GitHub on the open source?

Everything's one, skill, and it's over?

Not so hot.

Don't mention it. It's hot.

It's no big deal, but it's too big to be disrespectful.

In other words: what you said on the Internet, what you wrote, what you recorded -- without your knowledge, consent or participation -- was fed to an AI model, and this AI model learned to think like you.

And then the distillation came out into a skill file and threw it to GitHub.

Anyone who downloads it and configures it can have a Zhang Snow Peak brain to make your decisions.

Does Zhang Xue Feng know? Do you agree?

And what's more, there are people who think it's "technological progress."

I'm not against AI being able to help people learn, help people progress. I object: ** Do this with real people and never ask anyone if they want to.**

You can train yourself an AI career counselor, no problem. You're going to pick up the public content of snowflake, train an "AI snowflake" and release it to make people think you're doing good things -- it's not technology, it's called a shop.

Zhang Xue Feng ' s occupation is to volunteer for a higher examination for children from ordinary families and to advise on career planning.

This job is not a pure knowledge output. It requires a great deal of experience, real-time diagnosis of changes in the industry and a common understanding of different family contexts. Which one of these can be summed up by the word "distilled"?

You feed his public statements to models that learn the way he talks, some of his judgment frameworks. But what about his limitations? What about his blind zone? What's beyond his intellectual boundaries?

An incomplete snowflake, packaged into a ready-to-use skill, then used to make real career planning proposals - who's taking the risk?

** Is that the person who downloaded the skill, or the person who opened the skill, or is it Zhang**

No one will feel responsible. But the problem is, this skill is wrong for you, you're on the wrong side of your life, no one's paying you back.

Others have changed the essence of the matter by saying, "It's the industry practice to use public content to train AI, and OpenAI does it, Google does it, why can't Zhang snowflake?"

That's two things.

The OpenAI training model, which feeds big data to a universal model, learns language skills and does not target any specific person. What's Zhang Snowflake Skill? It's a way of distilling a person's mind, replicating it in a specific way, and wrapping it into products that you use.

The former is universal language learning, while the latter is precision role-playing.

I have no objection to open-source communities making innovative tools. I don't object to my colleague.

What I object to is that** real people are used as raw materials and are perceived as driving technological progress.**

Where's the open source border? At least here:** You can use open source tools, but you can't open someone else's brain.**

Zhang Snow Peak is not a public domain data set. He is a living man who works, earns money and contributes to society through his cognitive abilities.

You distilled his brain, sealed it, opened it.

Does he know? Is there compensation for him? Has anyone asked him?

Three words: none.

Ultimately, it is a matter of informed consent**.

In the AI era, data are the most valuable fuel. And each of us speaks, thinks, judges are data. These data have been collected, cleaned, trained and, finally, simulated ourselves - a process that is itself controversial.

Zhang Snow Peak is not the first to be distilled. Before the lady skill, someone had done all sorts of skill. I guess now there's more on Github I haven't seen.

** The question is: what will become of this road at the end?**

Anyone can be disillusioned, anyone's judgment can be reproduced in bulk, and anyone's voice can be replaced by an open source document.

What's left of the real personal value?

I don't want moral kidnapping of the whole open-source community.

I just want to ask you: ** When you're about to distill a person, it takes three seconds to think: If it's the other way around, can you accept it?**

If not, take this warehouse and turn it off and do something else.

Technology runs as fast as possible. Ethics has to be followed.

Or the last one to come out, not the AI age, the wild age.