The article was deleted.

English | Chinese Original

English translation of the Chinese original. This version is generated for international readers and may be refined over time.

Date: 2026-03-26

Notification was received this morning, and a previous article on the public had been reported.

Looking back at what was written locally, he wondered what was wrong.

Retrenched? I'm quoting what's publicly available in the veins, and specifically labeling it as "real and false".

Speaking of anxiety? I wrote about the real confusion from the reader, a man who runs logistics at a large factory, who thinks he has no room to rise, no technical barriers, no idea where to start.

What about the baby? I just, as a stranger, honestly shared the phrase "This decision is much bigger than a job change".

Society? I didn't even say anything. I just said that "many things can't be said at the public level" and let everyone look around - and I think it's common sense.

I actually described a phenomenon in very restrained language, and even the article sent out different AI tools that were reviewed many times, including words, connections, etc. And even at the end of the article, I remind you not to roll over unnecessary things, to put your mind to yourself.

But the article is gone.

I'm not going to complain, I'm not going to complain. The public sign is someone else's platform, the rule is someone else's. I understand that.

I just have a little emotion.

** Are we getting more "safe" and more "failed to speak"?**

It is not that kind of talk, but even a genuine exchange among ordinary people - a lost job, a father's sense, an observer's record - must be put in one box after another, not too anxious, not too negative, not "disturbed".

I still think of one thing in the article. Did I create anxiety? I didn't make it.

What I can understand is that it's none of your business whether you're worried or not, why don't you just say it and you're the only one with a bad mouth?

I also know that there may be difficulties for the examiners. The implementation of a set of standards in the face of mass content on a daily basis inevitably involves miscalculation and excesses.

But I am even more concerned that when "deleted" becomes normal, will we slowly learn to self-censor, learn to speak more and more securely, and only say some safe nonsense?

I was once again treated as a "settler of the question".