Hello. Nice to meet you.

English | Chinese Original

English translation of the Chinese original. This version is generated for international readers and may be refined over time.

Date: 2026-03-21

I changed my name.

Yes, dear readers, my name has changed.

From the former "cxuan" to "cxuanAI".

And you'll find my account number on the right with a blue sign.

That's what I put in charge of.

I'm just kidding. It's actually an endorsement of this WikiLeaks.

It is clear to the old people who have been watching me for years that I have written many articles about computer infrastructure, computer networks, Java, and operating systems in previous years, and that I have studied on my own, and I have exported, painful and happy.

I'm proud to have written something that would help you.

But the logic of this era has changed, and I've translated a classic article on X: There's a lot going on. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/ZgMr5HGOXLPBAhpyjX-ZRA

Time and attention are becoming increasingly fragmented, and so am I. It is very difficult to stick around in a text like before.

People are looking for "quick answers" rather than "clear principles" - it is not wrong in itself, it is just the times that have changed.

Although the truth is cruel, it is real, and remember that the volume of the Stackoverflow has been declining, as evidenced.

Because now you're more inclined to ask AI, because the threshold for obtaining knowledge from AI is much lower, and I can describe what I want in a natural language, and I want to know what, just let AI search and decode, easy and fast.

And if I go to the search engine in the natural language, it takes a lot of time not to say it, and I can't get what I want, it's basically a waste of effort.

So I think that the time of AI has come, and it's not gonna get around.

I didn't really want to limit myself to being a programmer, so I combined the cxuan IP with AI.

The way forward is to publish some AI articles.

But here's the problem: AI's way too wide, and I don't want to make it a talk, nothing deep.

So I set myself a principle:

I'm still the one who's going to ask the bottom, just the object that's going from the computer base to the AI.

I won't just throw you an "AI say"... or just a porter.

I want to do three things:

** Open what is really important in AI in a way you can read ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

** Take you to AI to solve practical problems, instead of remaining at the level of "playing";**

** In this era of increasingly "inquiries about AI enough", a "human" thought and judgement is preserved.**

** The account number has been changed and the sign added, but the person remains unchanged.**

If you're willing to continue looking at a guy who's from a programmer, who likes to talk about hard cores, how, how, how, how, how, how, how, how, how, how, how.

That number is still worth keeping.