I recently contacted a big guy who told me some of the industry's rules.

English | Chinese Original

English translation of the Chinese original. This version is generated for international readers and may be refined over time.

Date: 2026-05-07

I recently contacted a big guy who told me some of the industry's rules.

I was really shocked.

He told me that some of the master's readings were brushed.

The brushes are not limited to the public domain, but also include the video field.

Black.

The amount of brush can be used to make data, the data is found and the opportunity to advertise is found. Public video is the same.

And once the data is up, it can be very expensive.

Did I say it wouldn't affect future cooperation?

He told me that most of the ads were one-off, and it was over. There was no second chance.

It's a wave, but it's not a reader, it's an advertiser.

I don't think so. Readers and advertisers cut it together.

However, such behaviour can have indelible effects on the industry.

The first is the issue of industry reputation. Once the industry's reputation stinks, the outside world will admit that "the business is all water", that the public sign is all brushed up, and no matter how serious you are, your first reaction is questionable.

Then comes the issue of the bad currency being expelled, and those who do what they do with their good will spend a lot of effort and no more than a few hundred data numbers, either cold or forced to do it, so that the industry's standards and bottom lines are lowered.

What matters most is the question of trust. Readers think they're concerned about high-quality creators, and find content mixed with data, and the sense of deceptiveness is hard to reverse; the advertiser throws a totally different picture, and next time, the entire platform, the entire field, will be guarded. Once you don't believe it up and down, the ecological collapse is not far away.

So why isn't the platform managing this kind of thing?

The reality is very complex, not that the platform does not want to, but that it does not. There are policy responses.

In the meantime, I looked at the data from the various platforms.

I think micro-ecology is pretty good.

The underlying reason for the persistence of brushing is that it is a long-term, highly technical and profit-driven confrontation.

This is hard to cure.

It may seem a little heavy to say that.

Nor do I stand in moral high places to judge anything, but as a member of this ecology, to see this tendency to evict good money will inevitably be worthless for those who are serious.

Because I really have a hard-working, hard-working, quiet-pusher with little flow of authors.

They deserve the attention of the platform.

I hope the world gets better.