English | Chinese Original

English translation of the Chinese original. This version is generated for international readers and may be refined over time.

Date: 2026-04-29

When I first approached AI this year, I didn't know how to play, so I got one.TraeAs the entry point for my contacts with AI Native, application development and understanding of LLM.

I remember writing an interesting program at the time, in which I realized that the AIDE facility, the difference from the traditional Java IDEA, and the way it was used, was still enormous.

Maybe I'm destined to have some kind of bad and bad history with Trae, just when our baby's stable, and at the right time, IDE, who knows what to say.

But at first I didn't open SOLO, why, because I really had no money.

So this time I heard that Trae SOLO was independent and measured, and I downloaded it in the first place.

Download and install finished interfaces, um, very refreshing.

And then when I clicked on Log in, it came out of the interface, and it made me feel the tremors of my heart.

I saw it.

"Who knows, it's like old friends seeing each other in red?"

Digging gold, as one of my favorite communities to write in my ancient times, was a wonderful time when Trump was not on stage, the international situation was stable, gold was not so expensive and earning money was not so hard.

As a community builder who didn't have a lot of money at the time, a million-dollar producer, a great creator, and a great fan, the idea of gold has to be done. How can you not cry when you see the people who bought it?

So the wave has to log in through the gold.

Log in after actually. Do you want internal measurements?

I'm done. I don't know the Trae community. Fortunately, I had a good relationship with the gold-digger official. I licked the inside.

More importantly, I'm not just licking an internal code, I'm licking 100 + an internal code!

See the end!

But then again, why did Trae develop an IDE with an SOLO model, and this time, why do you want to go out and do a Trae SOLO CN?

I made it answer for itself.

Functional Dimensions	Trae Solo CN	TraeCN 's Solo Mode
** Product form**	Independent end product (PC + Web end)	Working mode in IDE
** The modalities of the visit**	Pass.https://solo.trae.cnDirect access	Switch on in TraeCN IDE
** Core model**	Double mode design: Code and MTC (More Than Code)	Single Solo mode
** Documents processing capacity**	Support for a variety of format documents: stenography of meetings, raw data, hand-drawing sketches, etc.	Main Process Code File
** Capability range**	Broaden the entire Internet industry upstream and downstream, handling multiple tasks across borders	Main focus on code development
** Project construction**	Support for complete construction from zero	Support for complete construction from zero
AI capacity	Autodismantling of tasks, generation of multiple file codes, installation dependency, running debugging	Autodismantling of tasks, generation of multiple file codes, installation dependency, running debugging
** Real-time preview**	Support Webview real-time preview page effects	Support Webview real-time preview page effects
** Model transition**	Support to switch internal and custom access models	Support to switch internal and custom access models
** Cross-platform**	Support both PC and Webends	Run only in IDE
** Independent visit**	No IDE need to be installed to access it directly via browser (of course download PC end)	Need to install Trae CN IDE first
** Lightweight**	Lightweight design for fast mission	As part of IDE, it's more fully functional and heavier. Level

In summary, Trae SoloCN is a more independent, lightweight, multifunctional AI development tool, while TraeCN ' s Solo model is part of IDE and focuses more on code development scenarios. The unique advantage of Trae SoloCN lies in its ability to cross borders and the ease of independent access.

The solo model used to be paid for, and now it's free.

The difference between MTC and Code has been unclear, asking Trae.

Just like the plan Mode in CC, put the plan down and run it in batches, fit for Spec, then work.

In other words, the Code model may not consider Plan Mode as comprehensive as it is, but it is suitable to go straight out of the MVP version.

Skills has a lot of stuff in the store, even supporting the liipay and douyin skills.

What does that mean? The ecological integration capability of the byte system is strong.

I've done some work

I've written a little tool with it.

It's the Code model, because I'm in a hurry, and I don't like to go ahead and work, and it's better for me to go straight to work.

My need for it is simple: to write a Python script and download the photo links from the Markdown file locally. I've written this before in Claude Code, so I can compare it.

Trae SOLO's response is really fast. It went over the whole idea and started writing code. The whole process took about a minute, and the script came out.

But if you compare it to Claude Code, it's a thousand times.

Claude Code has the advantage of being more stable. You give it a complex need, and it'll put the plan in a clear line with Plan Mode, and then implement it step by step. The probability of error is low, but it is slow.

Trae SOLO's advantage is "fast" and "intuitive". It's not so much about perfect solutions, give you a run-away version, and then you're going to change. It's actually quite suitable for fast prototype development.

MTC mode tried

And then I tried the MTC model to help me plan a slightly more complex project -- a simple post management backstage.

MTC mode does look more like Claude Code's plan Mode. It analyses your needs, lists technical options, catalogue structure, database design and then generates a detailed implementation plan. It didn't start until you confirmed it.

This model is for a scenario where you haven't figured out what to do and need an AI to help you figure it out. Like you want to do something, but not sure what technology is, MTC will give you a few options for your choice.

But to be honest, MTC is a little too cautious for someone like me who already knows what I want. I prefer Code's "dry first."

We don't talk enough

Of course not.

What I've come across is that the history of dialogue is sometimes lost for no reason, so just reboot it; sometimes the code is small and has to be manually repaired.

There are two regrets that community feedback is more focused. One is the lack of contact with flying books - many people use flybooks to match their demands, and if they synchronize their minutes and talk directly to SOLO, the collaborative experience would be more fluid. The other is not to support a time-bound mission, but to produce a weekly daily newspaper on a regular basis.

And there are pricing issues. It's now free, but how do you charge for the official edition? The byte style has always been free-of-charge before commercialization, followed by an approximate fee formula that no one knows.

Finally

In 2026, the AI programming tool was not a question of whether to use it, but of which.

Cursor is the most expensive, Claude Code is the firmest but most commandist, Windsurf rules, Trae SOLO wins free and easy. For domestic developers, Trae also has a natural advantage - good understanding in Chinese, gold-diggering accounts, byte ecological integration.

It's nice to see Trae SOLO as an old user of byte products from the gold age. It's not perfect, but it's in the right direction, and it's online.

If you're looking for an AI IDE, try downloading it.

As for me, I'm going to reset my half-dead project. After all, it's a waste of nothing to do with the tools.

---

We've got 100 insiders for Trae's friends. This is a big deal!

KLnznuH7

https://solo.trae.cn/invitation/KLnznuH7

uwJweE8n

https://solo.trae.cn/invitation/uwJweE8n

Two yards, but more than 100 places, you know, first come first.

I'll give you all the insides.